7mm Rem Magazine vs .300 Win Magazine: A Battle of Two Iconic Magnums

[ad_1]

These two magnum cartridges are nearer than you may factor. The 7mm Rem Magazine is pictured left, the 300 Win Magazine is on the precise. Outside Life

For cartridge connoisseurs, the early Sixties was a monumental time interval with the launch of two of essentially the most profitable big-game cartridges of our time, the 7mm Remington Magnum and .300 Winchester Magnum. Naturally, the 2 cartridges have been pitted towards one another since their inception. Sixty years later, every cartridge has rightfully amassed a loyal following. So what are the essential components when evaluating the 7mm Rem Magazine vs .300 Win Magazine?

Each cartridges are long-action magnum cartridges able to taking all of North America’s huge sport. Each provide all kinds of bullet weights and configurations. There are additionally all kinds of rifles chambered in every. Put plainly, the 2 cartridges are comparable, however the .300 Win Magazine is able to utilizing heavier bullets whereas the 7mm Rem Magazine produces much less felt recoil. 

Each cartridges exhibit sure strengths and weaknesses once you begin to nitpick. Relying in your looking aspirations, one could suit your wants higher than the opposite.

7mm Remington Magnum Specs

• Bullet Diameter: .284 inches
• Case Size: 2.5 inches
• Total Size: 3.29 inches
• Father or mother Case: .375 H&H

.300 Winchester Magnum Specs

• Bullet Diameter: .308 inches
• Case Size: 2.62 inches
• Total Size: 3.34 inches
• Father or mother Case: .375 H&H

Historical past

7mm Remington Magnum

Many new cartridges are available in scorching after which fade with time. That’s not the case with the 7mm Rem Magazine. In addition to its flat-shooting and hard-hitting capabilities, the 7mm Remington Magnum owes a lot of its preliminary success to its launch coinciding with Remington’s introduction of the Mannequin 700 rifle in 1962. The Mannequin 700 is likely one of the hottest looking rifles in historical past and the 7mm Remington Magnum rode its recognition upon introduction. 

The 7mm Rem Magazine’s mum or dad case is the venerable .375 H&H shortened and necked right down to accommodate a .284 caliber bullet and slot in a standard-length rifle motion. On the time of its introduction, the .30/06 Springfield was the usual all cartridges have been in contrast towards. The 7mm Rem Magazine is ballistically superior to the .30/06 in each class and the brand new cartridge was an on the spot success. Since then, the 7mm Rem Magazine has turn into one of the crucial common big-game cartridges of recent time. 

.300 Winchester Magnum

Following the success of the 7mm Rem Magazine, Winchester adopted go well with with its personal magnum, introducing the .300 Win Magazine only a yr later in 1963. Just like the 7mm Rem Magazine, the .300 Win Magazine makes use of the .375 H&H case, shortened and necked down to fireplace .308 caliber projectiles. Because of the bigger case capability, the .300 Win Magazine delivers each a flatter trajectory and noticeably extra power down vary when in comparison with the 30/06.

Winchester properly supplied the brand new cartridge within the common Mannequin 70 rifle, and the .300 Win Magazine took off in recognition as nicely. Inside a number of quick years most main ammunition producers have been producing .300 Win Magazine ammo and so they nonetheless are immediately.

Ballistics

Ballistically talking, the 7mm. Rem Magazine and .300 Win Magazine are a lot nearer than their loyal fan bases want to admit. Provided that they each derive from the identical mum or dad case, each cartridges function comparable case capability and have some overlap in bullet weight choice. Right here’s how they stack up with a number of common masses. 

150-Grain Federal Energy-Shok

To show their similarities, the primary comparability I pulled was Federal Premium’s 150-grain Energy-Shok ammunition, as Federal masses this identical bullet for each cartridges.

7mm Remington Magnum

• Muzzle Velocity: 3,110 fps
• Power @300 yds: 1,969 ft-lb
• Drop @300 yds: 10.4 inches

.300 Winchester Magnum

• Muzzle Velocity: 3,150 fps
• Power @300 yds: 1,975 ft-lb
• Drop @300 yds: 10.2 inches

Sure, the .300 Win Magazine does have a mouse hair of a bonus on this comparability, however the numbers are so shut that the distinction is negligible.

Heavy-for-Caliber Bullets

One benefit the .300 Win Magazine has over the 7mm Rem Magazine is its potential to shoot heavier projectiles. Standard bullet weights for the .300 vary from 150- to- 200-grains whereas frequent bullet weights for the 7mm Rem Magazine vary between 140- and- 175-grains. Larger could sound higher however that isn’t all the time the case. Ballistic coefficient and sectional density of a bullet each play an element of their ballistic and terminal efficiency. Given the identical weight projectile, .284 bullets will sometimes have each the next B.C. and sectional density than .308 caliber bullets of equal weight, leading to higher penetration regardless of the smaller diameter bullet.

So now let’s evaluate a “heavy-for-caliber” providing from each cartridges. For the 7mm Rem Magazine, I caught with the “Massive Inexperienced” practice and chosen Remington’s 175-grain Core-Lokts. For the .300 Win Magazine, I pulled information for Hornady’s 200-grain ELD-X loaded of their Precision Hunter line.

7mm Rem Magazine, 175-grains

• Muzzle Velocity: 2,860 fps
• Power @300 yds: 1,958 ft-lb
• Drop @300 yds: 7.6 inches (200-yard zero)

.300 Win Magazine, 200-grains

• Muzzle Velocity: 2,850 fps
• Power @300 yds: 2,563 ft-lb
• Drop @300 yds: 7 inches (200-yard zero)

Clearly, the heavier bullet fired from the .300 Win Magazine generates considerably extra downrange power. Nevertheless, the distinction in bullet drop between the 2 is nominal. Plus, the 1,958 ft-lbs of power that the 175-grain Core-Lokt transfers at 300 yards will nonetheless ship ample power to take down a rut crazed bull elk with authority.

Ballistically talking, the 2 cartridges are very comparable when capturing the identical weight projectiles. Though, there is no such thing as a refuting the substantial further power that the .300 Win Magazine produces when capturing heavier bullets.

READ NEXT: Finest Elk Looking Calibers

Recoil

Each of the cartridges ship stout recoil. Figuring out the precise quantity of felt recoil of the 2 cartridges is troublesome given the various variables like rifle weight, powder cost, and bullet weight. Nevertheless, it’s a provided that the .300 Win Magazine generates extra recoil than the 7mm Rem Magazine. On common, the 7mm Rem Magazine produces about 24 ft-lbs of recoil. The .300 Win Magazine produces about 30 ft-lbs of recoil, roughly 20 % extra. For reference, a .270 Winchester generates about 20 foot-pounds of recoil.

For some, recoil generally is a deal breaker. For others, it’s a small a part of the equation. Regardless of the place you stand, the lighter recoil of the 7mm Rem Magazine offers it the sting by way of consolation and shootability. 

Including a muzzle brake or suppressor to a rifle chambered in both of those cartridges will assist scale back felt recoil.

Accuracy

Figuring out an accuracy winner between the 2 cartridges is sort of inconceivable. Each the 7mm Rem Magazine and .300 Win Magazine comprise the flexibility to ship spectacular accuracy outcomes. I’ve owned and shot rifles chambered in each of those cartridges that constantly produced sub-MOA outcomes. Personally, I had a .300 Win Magazine that might pop 1-gallon milk jugs at 1,000 yards with regularity. It could take some tinkering with numerous masses to seek out the candy spot in your specific rifle, however relaxation assured each cartridges are correct.

Nevertheless you, the rifleman, should have the ability to shoot these onerous recoiling cartridges precisely. Even in the event you’re a troublesome man, it’s a problem to shoot massive magnum cartridges with constant accuracy. In different phrases, choosing one in every of these two boomers in your first looking rifle might be not a clever selection.

As Jim Carmichel as soon as wrote: “After we use tools that degrades our marksmanship, there’s a corresponding loss in our potential to kill sport effectively.” 

Terminal Efficiency

There isn’t any denying the spectacular terminal efficiency that each of those cartridges show. Merely peer by means of the power numbers on ballistic charts, even at prolonged distances, and it’s simple to see why each the 7mm Rem Magazine and .300 Win Magazine are beloved by so many hunters.

I’m partially biased, seeing that I grew up capturing deer, elk, and pronghorn throughout the West with my 7mm Rem Magazine, and it by no means failed me. My father additionally has a trusty Remington Mannequin 700 chambered in 7mm Rem Magazine that has globetrotted the world over for greater than 30 years. Throughout that point, “ol dependable” has taken down the whole lot from a colossal 71-inch bull moose in Alaska, to an enormous eland in Africa, and nearly the whole lot else in between. Would the .300 Win Magazine have finished the identical job? Completely. 

However my level is that this: Don’t low cost the terminal capabilities of the 7mm Rem Magazine merely due to its smaller diameter projectiles.

READ NEXT: Finest Lengthy-Vary Calibers

Ammunition Availability and Choice

Happily, each the 7mm Rem Magazine and .300 Win Magazine are each amongst the most well-liked trendy looking cartridges and ammunition producers produce copious quantities of each. There are a plethora of bullet weight and bullet configurations to select from. 

Hunters constantly debate their favourite cartridges, typically overlooking the truth that the development of the bullet they select is equally, if no more, essential than the cartridge itself. For critters which can be elk-sized and greater, you’ll profit from selecting a controlled-expansion sort bullet to maximise penetration and efficiency. For deer and pronghorn, it is smart to pick out a rapid-expansion sort bullet however be warned, they may inflict critical meat harm to the impression space. Do your homework when choosing a bullet in your upcoming hunt and select properly.

The worth of ammunition appears to fluctuate, however 7mm Rem Magazine ammunition varies in value from $35 – $90 per field of 20 rounds. Common value per field sometimes hovers between $50 to $60. Comparatively, a field of .300 Win Magazine ammunition does value barely extra with a mean value of $55 to $65 per field of 20 rounds. The slight improve in value is smart given the ever so slight improve in case capability for the .300 Win Magazine and the heavier bullets.

Last Ideas on 7mm Rem Magazine vs .300 Win Magazine

Greater than seemingly, hunters will nonetheless be arguing concerning the superiority of each of those cartridges for one more 60 years. The fact being that they dang close to ballistically mirror one another given the identical weighted bullet. The one benefit that the .300 Win Magazine has, lies in its potential to fireplace a lot heavier projectiles and subsequently generate a formidable quantity of down-range power with these heavier bullets. On the flip facet, the 7mm Rem Magazine nonetheless produces loads of power with noticeably much less recoil.

Personally, I used to be going to hunt the enormous bruins or moose of the North, I’d lean towards the .300 Win Magazine. Nevertheless, for the whole lot within the decrease 48, I’ll proceed to stay to my tried-and-true 7mm Rem Magazine. No matter your selection, you can’t go fallacious with both cartridge, as long as you’ll be able to shoot them with constant accuracy.

The put up 7mm Rem Magazine vs .300 Win Magazine: A Battle of Two Iconic Magnums appeared first on Outside Life.

Articles could comprise affiliate hyperlinks which allow us to share within the income of any purchases made.

[ad_2]